Traffic

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Some notes



 (READ FROM THE FIQH JINAYAH) (FRONT PART IS INCOMPLETE)
Islamic Law Notes
1. Marriage is a contract entered into by a man and a woman to live as husband and wife.
AQ
Al Rum (30:21)
Al Nahl (16:72)
An Nisa (4:1)
Sunnah
1. “Modesty is part of faith.”
2. “Men marry women for their piety, or their property, or their beauty, but you should marry for piety.”
3. “There is no celibacy in Islam.”
Choice of partner and the power of Ijbar
- A man shall see the intended bride before betrothal
AQ: (24:30) and Baqarah (2:232)
- The partner should be the one with the most piety (according to hadith)
- No concept of courtship (a period where couples develop a romantic relationship with a view to marry).
- Consent of the parties – power of ijbar is granted to the wali.
Legal rulings
i) Wajib – If the man can’t control his sexual desires. It becomes compulsory for him to get married.
ii) Haram – If the person knows for certain that he or she cannot fulfill the duties in marriage. If he is financially unstable or if he has a tendency to commit violence then it is prohibited.
iii) Makruh – If unable to fulfill the spousal duties. If he thinks he is not fit enough to carry out his marital responsibilities.
iv) Mandub – recommended as provided in the Hadith of PM.
Pillars of nikah (marriage is invalid if at least 1 of it is not fulfilled)
i) Man,
ii) woman,
iii) 2 male witnesses,
 iv) wali,
v) ‘aqad or utterance of words (ijab and qabul) (offer and acceptance).

1. The man and woman must be a real man and woman (not a person who has undergone sex change operation).
2. Both male and female upon entering the contract of marriage must give free consent (free from obstacles). Must be identified i.e. they must not be in prohibited degrees of marriage according to an-Nisa (4:23-24).
Permanent prohibition:                                                                         
i) Blood relationships – includes mother, stepmother, grandmother, daughter, son, sister, brother, etc.
ii) Marriage
iii) Sucklings – If a mother breastfeeds a child from another mother. The biological child and the other child are within prohibited degrees.
Temporary prohibition:
i) 2 sisters at one time
ii) married woman
iii) 4 wives at a time
iv) A woman during the period of ‘iddah.
Wali – a legal authority is vested in a person fully qualified and competent to safeguard the interest and rights of another person who is incapable of doing so independently. In accordance with priority: father, grandfather, brother, uncle and cousin.
Conditions to be a wali
i) Not a fasiq person; meaning a fair and just person.
ii) Must be a person who performs the hajj or pilgrimage.
Hadith: ‘No woman may conduct a marriage contract of another woman, no woman may conduct the marriage contract on behalf of herself.

3 types of Wali
i) Wali Mujbir/ nasab
- guardian by force (paksa). Force to marry a man of his choice. Full power to endorse a marriage on behalf of everyone under his care.
Syafie school: Although the wali may marry off the virgin daughter without her consent, it is recommended to ask for her consent.
In the case of a daughter being widowed or divorced, the wali mujbir may not have full power to force to enter a marriage unless by a clear permission from the widow or divorcee. A widowed woman has more rights than her guardian. As for the virgin woman, it is recommended for the father to ask permission from such woman and her silence is her consent.
ii) wali ab’ad / akrab
Person other than the father or grandfather. Can’t force the marriage.
iii) wali raja/hakim
- person which has been conferred authority by the Sultan or State to marry a woman who has no wali from a family (male side).

If there is a refusal to marry the daughter from wali mujbir or nasab, bring the case to court and wali hakim can be utilized. If wali ab’ad disappeared or went missing, wali hakim takes its place in the event of the bridge’s conversion.

Conditions for witnesses are similar to that of a wali, i.e. not deaf, a Muslim and etc.

‘Aqad refers to the solemnization of marriage. It refers to ijab and qabul, i.e. offer and acceptance. It is conducted by a wali.








Polygamous marriage
It is a system of marriage where a man has more than 1 wife. It is recognized in Syariah law with restrictions. (4:3), (4:129)
It is permissible to have up to 4 wives provided certain conditions are fulfilled. The PM took orphans and widows as his wives which made it permissible. To contract a polygamous marriage, there is a need to provide reasonable justifications, i.e. not to satisfy his own desires.

Justifications:
1. The wife is a barren. It may make the husband suffer from deprivation from being a father. The alternative is to take another fertile wife.
2. Wife is ill due to an incurable disease for e.g. It restricts the husband from having sex.
(4:129)
It states that you are never able to be fair and just to women even though it is your ardent desire. The verse shows that it is discouraged to have polygamous marriage as treatment towards the wives may differ. The husband may not be able to financially or physically support the wives.
Interfaith marriage
- Non-Muslims must convert for them to contract a marriage (2:221). It is not recommended for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim unless or until the non-Muslim converts.
Mut’ah marriage / temporary
- Mostly done overseas. It is a kind of marriage contracted between a man and a woman that specifies how long the marriage will last. The beginning and end of the marriage is specified. The solemnization of marriage follows that of the akad nikah. The majority of Muslim jurists do not recognize such marriage as they find it illegal. It is practised by the Shiah school and they based it on a hadith:
‘Temporary marriage was allowed at the beginning of Islam. A man comes to a town where he has no acquaintance, so he marries a wife for a fixed time depending on his stay in the town and after the fixed time ended, he divorced her.’
It was rejected by the Sunni schools as the chain of narrators was weak. It was a Hadith dhaif. They used another Hadith to oppose that hadith. It indicated that the PM forbade the practice of nikah mut’ah.
Hadith by Muslim: Prophet has forbidden temporary marriage on the day of khaibar.
Hadith by Ibnu Majah: PM has said that I swear by the name of Allah, if I find anyone who engages in Mut’ah marriage, I will have him lashed for 100 stripes.
Mut’ah marriage is prohibited. Shiah school recognizes the needs of men who travel abroad without bringing their wives. It is to prevent them from committing fornication by getting married. No divorce or other obligations, i.e. no inheritance and etc. If they have kids, the mother will be the person who will provide care.
Misyar marriage
A type of marriage contracted between man and woman which is valid but it is not recognized in certain situations. The woman would waive certain rights that she should have had in a normal Islamic marriage. It is contracted usually for the sake of having a legal and sexual relationship only. It is sort of a legal prostitution.
According to Yusuf al-Qardhawi, the misyar marriage is recognized to a certain extent. It is acceptable if the woman is of older age (spinster). It may serve a good purpose for them to contract misyar marriage, i.e. to have an offspring of their own. They do not need a man to support them financially.
Child marriage
- Underage marriages. 16 years for girls and 18 years for men. It is permissible to a certain extent. However, the possibility of child exploitation is high. It is permissible in IFLA but must get the permission in court.
Talaq
It is to untie or release the matrimonial knot by uttering words that denote divorce.
4:19, 4:128, 4:35
Divorce is discouraged in Islamic law. It brings negative effects to the family ties, to the couple and the children.
There are 2 ways to pronounce talaq:
1. Sarih – when the husband says the word talaq or divorce to his wife clearly, free from ambiguity.
2. Kinayah – indirect, ambiguous, can be interpreted in more than 1 way. For instance, it is uncertain as to whether the husband was divorcing her or not. It is brought to the syariah court to determine whether the husband meant to divorce his wife. For e.g. ‘I do not want you anymore’ can have more than 1 meaning. The Court will look into the intention of the husband.

Talaq Raji’e
- A revocable divorce.
Talaq Ba’in Kubra / talaq 3 – irrevocable divorce.
Talaq 1 and 2 – can still reconcile the marriage. After this talaq, the wife goes into ‘iddah period. Within that period they can reconcile the marriage without going through adat nikah. If done after the iddah period, then the parties need to go through the solemnization of marriage (adat nikah) again.
Talaq 3 – it will be an irrevocable divorce. It cannot be reconciled between the parties unless the wife marries another man and divorces that man. Then the parties can remarry again.
(2:230)
Khulu’
It means redemption. The wife can request the husband to divorce her. The wife pays the husband some money, or in kind. If such amount is agreed upon, then the court will assess the amount in accordance with the means of the parties. Perhaps if the wife can’t be obedient towards the husband in marriage, i.e. if she has a boyfriend for example, then this is a good way of divorce.
Fasakh
It is also a type of divorce for women to seek. It is an annulment of marriage that is granted by the court after hearing the wife’s complaint in court. This kind of divorce is done if the husband refuses to divorce the wife. Section 49 of IFLA.
Reasonable justifications are needed for a valid fasakh to be granted. For example, ill-treatment by the husband, the husband can’t support her financially, he is impotent, he forces the wife to indulge in immoral activities and etc.
Ta’alik
- It is a conditional divorce. A kind of divorce when the husband breached certain conditions or promises made to the wife.
i) Conditions stipulated in the marriage certificate. After the marriage the husband has to read certain conditions. For instance, if the husband fails to provide maintenance to the wife for 4 consecutive months, they are automatically divorced.
ii) Type of conditions given by the husband and agreed by the wife during the course of their marriage.
Li’an
It is an affirmation given by the husband to the wife in court confirming that the wife had committed adultery or an oath to deny that the baby that is carried by his wife is his. It is followed by the same oath by the wife confirming to the contrary. The court will announce a major separation meaning the parties cannot get back together anymore.
Al Nur (24:6,7,8,9)
Zihar
It is a divorce when the husband similarises the wife with his mother. It is haram and when such is uttered, a divorce will occur. However, this type of divorce is not recognized by the Sunni school.

Ancillary claims
1. Muta’ah
- It is compensation or something that is given by court order, by the ex-husband to the ex-wife for the purpose of bringing pleasure upon divorcing her. It is only given to the wife unless she is (i) nusyuz; or (ii) she was divorced by way of khulu’.

Nusyuz – unreasonably disobeying the lawful wishes or commands of the husband
Baqarah (2: 236, 237, 241)
(33:49)

2. Nafaqah – maintenance for the ex-wife and children
Ex-wife
- The ex-wife is entitled to get a reasonable nafaqah from the ex-husband during the iddah’ period. It is given once the divorce is finalized by the court until the end of iddah’ period.
- It is prescribed in Nisa (4:34) that ‘Men are protectors and maintainers for women’.
Baqarah (2:233)
(65:7)
- The maintenance will cease if the wife dies. To determine the amount for nafaqah, the court will look at the capability of the husband and the wife’s financial needs.

Children
- The children are entitled to get nafaqah from the father even though the children decided to stay with the mother or other appointed persons.
- It’s not only about the financial needs, but also sufficient accommodation, food, clothing, medical treatment, education and etc. It is provided according to the husband’s means.
- It expires when the child reaches the age of 18 but it is not absolute. The court may extend the duration for the payment of nafaqah under special circumstances, for e.g. disabled children.


3. Hadanah/ Custody/ Guardianship
- Upon divorce, if the child is 2.5 years or younger, the child is usually given to the mother due to breastfeeding. When the child reaches the age of Mumahyis, i.e. when the child can differentiate good and bad (7 years old for male and 9 years old for female), the child will be given a choice as to who they will choose to be wish: the mother or father.
- The Court in reality will decide based on the welfare of the child. The Court will choose the guardian or Hadinah where he or she is a Muslim, of sound mind, matured, of good behaviour and environment.

4. Mahr / Dowry
- It is an obligatory marriage payment from the husband to the wife during akad nikah. If it is not paid during the marriage and after divorce, the husband has to still pay mahr to the ex-wife. The wife, however, can waive the right to mahr. The payment of mahr is made in money or in kind.

5. Matrimonial Property / Harta Sepencarian
- It refers to assets from both parties to the marriage acquired during the marriage. The Court will divide the proceeds of sale between the parties.
(i) Boto v Jaafar and (ii) Roberts v Umi Kalthum

- It was held that if the wife didn’t contribute financially, her duties as a wife is considered. The assets must be divided proportionately.



























Fiqh Jinayah

Elements of a crime

1. Legal element
- A clear provision describing the prohibition of the act. It prohibits the act that constitutes the offence and specifies the punishment.
 - For e.g. in Maidah (5:38), it is a clear provision for the punishment of theft : amputation of hands.
Al-Nur (24:2) is also a clear provision for adultery or fornication punishment, i.e. 100 stripes of whipping. The punishment for married adulterers is death by stoning according to the Hadith.

2. Actus reus/ Adabi
- can be divided into intentional offences and unintentional offences.

Types of crime
1. Hudud – fixed punishments in the AQ and Sunnah, The punishment cannot be altered.

a) Adultery
- A wilful sexual intercourse between a man and a woman who are suspected to not have any valid marriage to each other. It is prescribed in (24:2). To prove adultery there must be 4 male witnesses (4:50).
- If use second source of evidence, then maybe the adulterers will be punished under ta’zir. Pregnancy out of wedlock is an evidence for adultery. Other offences such as bestiality, incest and etc are ta’zir offences. In Kelantan, the preliminary act of zina is recognized as an offence.

b) Qazaf (false accusation of adultery)
- It is an act of accusing someone of committing adultery without 4 male witnesses (24:4, 24:5)
Requirements:
i) The accuser and the accused are adults
ii) They must be Muslims
iii) They must be of sound mind and have reached the age of puberty
iv) The accuser done the accusation based on free will
v) The accused must be identified

- The accuser has to take on oath 4 times to avoid Qazaf punishment. He must take an oath (yamin) or li’an oath if he accuses without 4 male witnesses.
(24:6-9)
- He can also make a confession

c) Theft (Sariqah)
- It is defined as the taking away of property belonging to another person surreptitiously or secretly/discreetly. Maidah (5:38)



Elements:
1. AR : offender must have taken and moved the stolen property quietly from the custody of the owner.
2. The property taken must reach the prescribed value. It was prescribed by ijma’ of the jurists, i.e. quarter of dinar of gold or 3 dirhams of silver. It is equivalent to + RM 750-800.
Hadith: ‘The hand of a thief shall be cut off for stealing a quarter of dinar of gold’.

3. MR: It was done with free will, without any force or coercion. However, in the Hadith it is stated:
‘My people have been exempted from liability if it was done by mistake, coercion or forgetfulness.’

4. The property must be in custody, i.e. it must be protected or guarded. For e.g. the item was kept in a building or guarded by security.

Standard of proof: There must be testimony from 2 witnesses. There should also be secondary or corroborating evidences.

d) Dacoity and robbery (hirabah)
- It is the act of taking and moving away property openly by using force or extortion. It may include 1 or more persons in such commission.
- The elements are the same as theft. However, the AR differs as it is done with force or done openly.
- The punishment is in Maidah (5:33, 34), i.e. execution, crucifixion, exile, or cutting off the feet and hands. It is based on the seriousness of the offence. The judge will decide according to his discretion. The most favoured approach is banishment.
- Evidence: confession or testimony of 2 witnesses.

e) Khmar (wine drinking)
Maidah (5:90) – wine and gambling are of the work of satan.
- Its punishment is prescribed in the Hadith, i.e. ‘Every intoxicant is prohibited. I curse he who drinks, purchases or sells wine or causes others to drink it.’
- Khmar refers to fermented drinks from the grapes or dates/kurma.
- According to the Hanafi school, other juices or drinks that are fermented cannot be considered as ‘khmar’. Thus, if the person consumes this, he is not liable for hudud punishment; instead, he will be liable for ta’zir punishment.
- According to the 3 other schools, if a person takes any drink that induces intoxication either taken in large or small quantity, he is liable for hudud punishment.
- The punishment is whipping with 40 stripes according to Abu Bakar.

f) Apostasy (Riddah)
- Apostasy simply means the abandonment of Islam. It can be shown by the way the person refuses to admit that Islam is his religion or refuses to practice it. Majority of jurists argued that the apostate should be given the chance to repent, i.e. to come back to the Islamic religion.
- The punishment of apostasy is divided into 2 views. First view is based on the Hadith: ‘kill the person who abandoned his religion’.
- The second view is that the scholars deny or reject the Hadith used above as they concurred that it was a weak Hadith (dhaif).
- By adopting the 2nd view, time and space is given to apostates to repent or for rehabilitation. If they choose to renounce Islam, then so be it.
- The Syariah court rejected the application to change the religion based on recent cases (Lina Joy).
- Apostasy is punishable in ta’zir.


2. Qisas
- It refers to crimes of retaliation and blood money (diyah). It is the type of crimes where the punishments are prescribed in the AQ and Sunnah but it can be altered or remitted by the victims or by the victims’ heirs.

- It includes murder, culpable homicide, hurt and etc. If the victim pardons the offender, then the punishment can be reduced based on the victim’s permission.

A) Murder –act which causes the death of another:
i) the victim must be a living human being
ii) the victim must have died as the result of the accused’s act
iii) the accused has the wilful intention of causing the death of the victim. For e.g. look at the kind of weapon (the means) that may cause the death of the person.
iv) the requirement of the offender: the accused must be an adult and sane person. If the offender is a minor, i.e. below 16 years old according to the Shafie school, then he is punishable under ta’zir.

- The punishment is prescribed in Maidah (5:45), Baqarah (2:178), and (17:33)

B) Culpable homicide/ Quasi-intentional murder

In syariah law, culpable homicide occurs when someone who intentionally makes another person the direct object of some action that is normally fatal and the victim dies.

1. MR: The offender must have the intention of causing bodily harm to the victim and has no intention of causing death to the victim.
2. AR: The act of the accused or possibly the weapon which is not likely to cause death in the ordinary course of nature.
3. The victim died as a result of the act of the accused.

Hadith: ‘If a person kills another by throwing stone, by a whip or by a staff, its diyat will be 100 camels. It is paid either in lump sum or instalment for 3 years.’
- In reality, diyat is paid in money. 1 camel is worth around RM 2.5k – RM 3k. The punishment for murder is death. If the heirs forgave the murderer, then the punishment is reduced to the payment of 100 camels.

Maidah (5:45),  an-Nahl (16:126)

Jurists concurred as well that if discretionary punishment (ta’zir) is to be imposed on the offender, is for the sake of public interest.

C) Murder by Negligence
- It is a kind of crime where someone with no intention to cause any harm or death to the victim but it eventually caused death to the victim either by negligence or by mistake. For e,g, a person wrongly shot at a deer which was actually a man.

1. MR: the accused person has no intention to cause death
2. The accused must have committed some fatal action which caused the death of the victim.
3. The victim died as a result of the accused person’s action.

D) Causing bodily injury to person / hurt
AR: caused bodily injury to a person or caused the dismemberment of the victim, or illness and etc.
MR: intention

Impediments to Qisas
(a) Forgiveness of the victim/heirs

General rule: if a victim or his heir decides to forgive the victim, then the criminal does not need to serve the death penalty.
Rationale: Show the compassionate side of God, and to encourage the culture of forgiveness in the society if the family wishes to do so.

AQ:
Baqarah (2:178)
Isra (17:33)
Maidah (5:45)

(b) Child offenders

Nisa (4:6) –‘And test the orphans until they reach (the age of) marriage. If you perceive in them right judgment, hand over to them their wealth’.

- Based on the verse, can argue that if children cannot be trusted to be able to protect their wealth due to lack of maturity, then they cannot be liable for their crimes due to the lack of maturity.

Sunni: When children commit offences punishable under Qisas, the punishment for Qisas would not be imposed on them. They would be punished by ta’zir laws, meaning that the courts would have the discretion to decide the punishment that would be imposed upon the child. This punishment applies to children below the age of 16. This view is practised in Malaysia.

Rationale: Children should not be punished with Qisas because they do not have the maturity of mind to understand the nature of their actions.

(c) Offenders of unsound mind

- In order to be punished under Qisas law, the accused must be a sound person. If an insane person kills another, then his family or relatives will have to pay Diyat on behalf of him.

- Note: persons who murder another in the state of drunkenness are not exempted from Qisas. This is because the consumption of alcohol is prohibited and the consumption is voluntary. Therefore, the state of drunkenness was brought onto himself.

Baqarah (2:286)

(d) Absence of intention or malice
- This part covers murders by accident, negligence or mistake. If there was no intention to take the life of another, qisas punishment would not be imposed; the accused would be asked to pay Diyah instead.
- Example of crimes under this view: quasi-intentional murder and murder by negligence

- Majority of jurists: the presence of intention can be deduced from the type of weapon used. If it is likely to cause death (gun, knife, or etc) then the intention to murder may be established.

Nisa (4:92, 4:93)

Hadith: ‘Whoever eliminates a believer by mistake (let) he go with no cost of life and pay diyat to his household (which he killed), unless they (family killed) forgive him in the name of charity’

(e)Special circumstance
- Example: if someone damages the eye of a ‘Peeping Tom’, no sin is incurred.

Hadith: ‘If someone is peeping into your house without your permission, and you throw a stone at him and destroy his eyes, there will be no sin on you’.



3. Ta’azir / crimes of discretionary punishments
- punishments are not fixed in AQ and Sunnah. It is left to the discretion of legislators or judges. It is based on Nisa (4:123).

Types of crimes:
- Anything not fixed in AQ and Sunnah about its punishment. For example, extortion, Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT), spying, spreading of obscenity, slander, concealment of evidence, trespass, computer crimes and etc. Any violation of the offences prescribed by the ulul amri (authorities: legislator, judge, etc), then the accused will be punished accordingly.

- The second type of crimes can be referred to those where the punishment is in AQ and Sunnah, i.e. Hadd and Qisas, but the punishment is ta’zir simply because it didn’t fulfil all the requirements or evidences prescribed for Hadd or Qisas.


Aims of Punishment

1. Punishment is inflicted as a last resort. For e.g. those punishments under Hadd.
2. Exemplary purpose. To set an example to the public so that such crimes won’t be repeated in the future.
3. Reformation to the accused person from committing similar crimes in the future.
4. Retributive purpose. Punishments that can give justice to the victim’s heirs which are somehow necessary.

In Malaysia, hudud and qisas punishments are not enforced.


Inheritance, Wills and Hibah

-It is governed by the customary practice of the people. In the Middle East, during the time of the pharaohs, nobody would own property. People could only cultivate the land and take benefit but they didn’t own it.
- During Prophet Muhammad’s time, inheritance law was governed in detail by the Ijma’ of jurists. The customary practices are still accepted with reforms. Those practices which were contrary to Syariah law were rejected.
Inheritance: Nisa (4:11, 4:12, 4:176)
Ali Imran (3:180), Al-Hadid (57:10), Al-Anbiya (21:89)

Hadith: ‘Give the Faraid to those who are entitled to receive it. Then whatever remains, should be given to the closest male relative of the deceased’.

Hadith: A case where a wife of a man named Saad bin Rabi and her 2 daughters went to see PM and said that the husband had passed away. However, their uncle took all of his property and left nothing to them. PM replied that: Allah will decide on the matter and after that an-Nisa (4:11) was revealed. One of the Companions was asked to get 2/3 for the daughters, 1/8 for the mother and the balance to the uncle.

The significance of Nisa (4:11): It generates and formulates a systematic distribution of property upon the death of the person.
Nisa (4:13): This verse avoids disagreements or feud among family members of the deceased who are over the deceased’s property.

Before the distribution, there are 4 rights needed to be executed/performed:

1. Payment of funeral expenses for the deceased.
- It must be taken from the deceased’s estate or property. The payment is only to cover important rituals. However, if the heirs are willing to bear the costs of the funeral, then the expenses need not be taken from the deceased’s estate or property.

2. Settlement of debts
- The settlement of debts must be given priority. The debts must be settled by the living heirs. The deceased’s estate can also be used to settle the debts.

Hadith: Abu Bakar said that ‘I have witnessed PM settle the payment of debt first, before he made a will.’
Hadith: The soul of the believer hangs on his debt until it is paid on his behalf.

2 types of debts:
i) Debts owed to God. For e.g. payment of zakat. Another example would be the nazar, i.e. promises made to God (a vow). For instance, a person vows to do something for God if he gets an ‘A’ for the Islamic Law paper.
ii) Debts owed to other people, for e.g. to the bank. Money is taken from the deceased’s estate to pay for such debts. Another example would be the payment of unpaid mahr/dowry.

3. Disposition of a will or bequest made by the deceased
- Refers to the disposition of some property which takes effect upon death. The disposition is complete upon the acceptance from the beneficiary upon the death of the testator. The will is either made in writing or orally. It is recommended for the testator to make a will in the presence of 2 witnesses.
Maidah (5:106)

S.3 of the Muslim Wills Selangor Enactment 1999: Any will made orally must be witnessed by 2 competent witnesses.

4. Execution of a will
- In executing a will, there is a limitation on the disposition of property by way of will, i.e. a testator can only dispose 1/3 of his property by wasiyyah.
Hadith: ‘…PM said: you may make a will of a one-third of your property…’

- If the legal heirs have a consensus that more than 1/3 can be given through the will, then only the will can be valid. The consent must be given after the death of the testator. If given before, the will is invalid.

* After all of the 3 criteria (funeral expenses, settlement of debts, disposition of a will) are fulfilled, then according to Faraid, the property will be distributed accordingly.


Pillars and Conditions of Inheritance
1. Conditions for Muwarith/deceased/missing person
- Need a death certificate or a burial certificate, then faraid can be done (distributed). A death declaration can only be made when death is certain by way of evidence. High Court issues the death certificate. Such certificate is issued only after countless efforts to find the missing person were made.
- If a person is missing for 4 years or more continuously, a declaration of death may be made in Court. The missing person’s date of death is established from the date the death declaration is made. After such declaration, the property can be distributed in accordance with faraid.
- Any legal heirs that may have died prior to the date when the decree was made are not entitled to get any property. If the missing person or muwarith comes back, and the properties have already been distributed, he can only recover the remaining properties not yet distributed.

2. Legal heir (warith)
i) The legal heir must survive the muwarith. The father can inherit from the son and vice versa. If the father and son died together, if it is difficult to ascertain who died first, the general rule is that neither of them will inherit each other’s property. However, if there is evidence to show that one survived the other even for a short period, then the survivor can inherit the property. The next legal heir is entitled to get his property since the survivor died.

ii) An unborn baby or a baby in a womb is another kind of legal heir. It is only entitled to its share in faraid law and the portion will be reserved until he or she is born. If the baby dies, the portion is distributed among legal heirs who are still alive.
iii) The legal heir must be free from any obstacles or impediments to inherit.

3. The estate (irth)
- The estate or property must be halal in the eyes of Syariah. If the property is a liquor store, then it is haram and cannot be distributed. The property must also belong to the deceased at the time of his death. The estate or property must be in existence at the time of death.

Grounds for inheritance

1. Blood ties
- The muwarith and warith is related through blood ties, for e.g. father, mother, uncle and auntie. The blood ties must be legitimate. It can only be established by a valid marriage. Children born out of wedlock cannot inherit. They can only inherit from the mother’s side. An illegitimate child cannot be legitimate even if later the mother married to the biological father.

i) Child born into a marriage later declared as void by the court. A child may be born due to rape or other reasons. The issue is whether his child is a legitimate child and whether it affects his entitlement for inheritance? Majority of scholars concurred that as far as inheritance property is concerned, if the father accepts the child as his, the paternity can be established after the father’s name and the child is legitimate. Thus, he can inherit.

ii) Child who suckled from a woman other than this birth mother is not entitled to inherit any property from the suckling mother’s side.

iii) An adopted child. In Syariah law, an adopted child is not entitled to inherit from the adoptive parents. However, the adoptive parents can always give property to the adopted child though hibah or a will.

2. Marriage
- Marriage must be a valid marriage according to Hukum Syarak. If the marriage ends with a divorce and it was a revocable divorce, the marriage is still considered as a legal marriage during the period of iddah’. If the husband dies during that period, the wife can still inherit the husband’s property. Revocable divorce = talaq 1 and talaq 2.
- For irrevocable divorce, i.e. talaq bain sughra and talaq bain kubra, the wife cannot inherit the property since the marriage is not subsisting.

3. Patronage
- If the slave dies, the slave master can inherit his property if the slave died without leaving any legal heirs at all.

4. Escheat or Baitulmal
If a person dies without leaving any heirs, the property goes to the Baitulmal.  Hadith: ‘And whoever leaves property it is for his heirs, and I am the heir of a person who has no heirs.’

Impediments to inheritance
1. Murder
- if the legal heir kills someone, for e.g. a son killed his father, then the son cannot inherit. If murder by mistake or negligence, the murderer can still inherit.
Hadith: A murderer shall not inherit.

2. Difference of religion
-Change of religion will prevent a legal heir from inheriting. 2 persons from 2 religions do not inherit from each other ever. However, a will can still be made to distribute property.
Hadith: A Muslim cannot inherit an unbeliever and an unbeliever will not inherit a believer.

3. Slavery
- A slave cannot inherit. All of the slave’s property belongs to the master.

4. Difference of domicile
- Applicable to non-Muslims only. If a non-Muslim dies in a country, relatives from another country cannot inherit from him unless they are from the same country.


Wills / Wasiyyah
- Refers to a gift or contribution given to another person upon his death, whether done orally or in writing. It is a vow made by a person during his lifetime to do things after his death permitted by Hukum Syarak. Wasiyyah is complete when there is an offer made by the testator and an acceptance by the will recipient. If the acceptance is made when the testator is alive, then it is not a complete will.

Nisa (4:11) replaced Baqarah (2:180-182)

Hadith:
            O Messenger of Allah. I have wealth and I only have one daughter to inherit from me.
Shall I give two thirds of my wealth as Sadaqah?" "No," replied the Prophet. "Then, (shall I give) a half?." asked Sa'ad and the Prophet again said 'no.' "Then, (shall I give) a third?' asked Sa'ad. "Yes," said the Prophet. "The third is much. Indeed to leave your heirs well-off is better than that you should leave them dependent on and to beg from people. If you spend anything seeking to gain thereby the pleasure of Allah, you will be rewarded for it even if it is a morsel which you place in your wife's mouth.


Hadith: There is no right(fit) for a muslim who has something to bequest left to the two nights but his will was written in his presence.”

Hadith: “The worst are those who do not have time to make a will.”



Conditions of a will
1. Testator (Musi)
- Must be a mukallaf (reached the age of puberty and maturity)
- Made the will in his free will (free of fraud, undue influence, etc)
- Must possess the mental capacity to make a will.

2. Will recipient (Musa Lahu)
- Must be an identified person
- Must exist at the time of the death of the testator
- Can also be a school, mosque, charity, etc
- He or she is not required to be mentally capable
- If he or she hasn’t attained the age of puberty and majority, the trustee will hold the property for him or her.

3. Willed property (Musa Bihi)
- Movable or immovable property
- Must have value or benefits in the eyes of Syariah law. It must be a halal property.
- Property is transferable after the death of the testator.
- The property exists during the testator’s death.

4. Sighah Ijab and Qabul
- will is complete upon the acceptance by the will recipient upon the death of the testator. Any acceptance or rejection during the lifetime of the testator is not considered.
- The provisions in the will cannot go against the principles of Syariah
- If the will recipient died after the testator died, but didn’t clearly indicate whether he accepted the will, the heirs can accept or reject the will on behalf of the will recipient.


Allowable property portion to will – 1/3
- A testator can give to anyone when there is no longer any heir to take the property in the form of inheritance. In such a situation, more than 1/3 can be given. More than 1/3 can also be given if all of the legal heirs have given their consent.
- A will cannot be made in favour of legal heirs who are already entitled to inheritance under faraid law.

Hadith: ‘There will be no bequest to an heir.’

- However, the testator can still make a bequest to a legal heir if the other legal heirs have consented to it.








Cancellation of Wills

1. A will can be void if the testator is insane. If a will was made by a sound person and then he turned insane, the will is still valid.

2. A will is void if the testator becomes an apostate.

3. Wills are invalid due to incompletion of condition. For e.g. if the condition is: “If I die due to drowning, then you can take my assets”. If the testator dies in a different way, the will is invalid.

4. The will becomes void due to withdrawal of a will. The pronouncement for the withdrawal of a will can happen openly or secretly.

5. Rejection of a will. A will can be void if there is rejection from the will recipient; if the will recipient rejected the willed property.

6. Recipient dies before the testator. A will is void if the recipient dies before the testator.

7. If the beneficiary murders the testator. Hadith: ‘a murderer shall not inherit’. By way of analogy, the will recipient will also not get any property that has been willed to him. It applies in cases of intentional murder or quasi-intentional murder.

8. Damage to bequeathed property. The will may be void if the willed property is damaged before the acceptance is made by the will recipient.


Testate, intestate and partly-intestate property
1. Testate property
- refers to the property left behind by the deceased which has been included in a will as a whole. Property willed as a whole is a void will because only 1/3 of the property can be willed unless there is consent by the legal heirs.

2. Intestate property
- Property left behind by the deceased because there is no will. Division is according to faraid.

3. Partly intestate property
- The deceased property which is partly testate and partly intestate. It is the most common form in Malaysia. When the deceased left a will, the law applicable is the Probate and Administration Act. A grant for probate can be determined at the High Court. The application can only be made by the will recipient. If there is any dispute or objection from the legal heirs to the property that has been willed, the case is only brought to the Syariah Court to determine the validity of the will. It is brought to the High Court if the property is worth more than RM 600k.




Fiqh Al Muamalat
- Islamic Financial System

AQ: (35:12), (62: 9 - 11), (4:29)

Hadith: ‘A trustworthy & an honest & truthful businessman will rise up with martyrs on the day of Resurrection.’

Basic principles of fiqh muamalat
1. Business framework – based on AQ and Sunnah. The activities or transactions, behaviour of persons in the transactions must be in line with the principles in AQ and Sunnah, and Ijtihad. The members of the Syariah Supervisory Board (SSB) are appointed to ensure that the Islamic products adhere to Islamic law as well as give guidelines to those who want to be involved with Islamic business transactions.

- Allah permits a sale but prohibits a riba. Banks earn money through marking up the products instead of charging interest. Charge fees for financial facilities. Prohibition of riba promotes high moral value and ethics.

2. Prohibited activities – banks won’t loan to shops that sell liquor or to liquor factories and so on. Simply put, shops that deal with haram or prohibited materials will not be given a loan.

3. There will be no uncertainty/gharar and maisir (gambling). Any business trade that is based on uncertain events is haram in Fiqh Muamalat. For e.g. stock markets are haram in Syariah law. Furthermore, gambling is prohibited in Syariah law.

4. Recognises contractual relationships. The contractual relationship is based on the nature of transaction. For example, buyer and seller relationship, partnership relationship or creditors and debtors relationship are recognized.

5. Participation and risk sharing. Fiqh Muamalat offers depositors participation in a risk-sharing business rather than a business based on fixed interests. Depositors invest money to do a business. The risks are shared together between the bank and depositors.

6. Islamic ethics and behaviour. It is concerned with the way those involved in the business acts. Those involved should have good behaviour and ethics to promote their product by giving a good impression.

7. Contribute to the socio-economical goals of the society. The Fiqh Muamalat is socially responsible. It can help the poor and the needy in society. It can provide education and scholarships. Furthermore, payment of zakat can be made from the assets invested by Muslims.





Distribution of Wealth

1) Mirath (faraid)
2) Zakat
3) Sadaqah

2) Zakat is an obligatory yearly tax imposed to Muslims. Tawbah (9:60)
- With the obligation of paying zakat, it prevents the habit of being greedy. Those below a certain amount, for e.g. RM 2.5k don’t have to pay zakat.

3) Sadaqah is charity. It is given to individuals to help the needy and poor. It is not compulsory but encouraged to give charity.
Baqarah (2:191)

Zakat fitrah – during Hari Raya
Zakat harta – yearly tax


Main criteria of Islamic Constitutional Law
1. Relationship between man and God.
- can be seen through the rule of Islamic government. God is the ultimate goal. AQ : (29:69)

2. Sovereignty of the law is God himself. The scope of the activities will naturally come within the restriction ordained by God in the AQ Himself.
i) Political sovereignty
ii) Legal sovereignty
AQ: (12:40), (7:3)

3. Power of the government (Islamic polity/state)
- The concept of khilafah. Man is a representative of God to carry out responsibilities and duties in the AQ, Sunnah and Ijtihad of scholars.

4. Islamic constitution portrays stability in its law and permanence in its principle. It is flexible in its application.

5. Syura
- Body that is established to conduct the affairs of the state. (42:38), (3:159)

Principle of syura – cannot conduct on things already established in AQ and Sunnah unless the matters require further consultation.

6. The duty of the Islamic State is not just merely to maintain the internal order of the country or defend it but also to establish the zakat system and solat system. Without these systems, there can be no Islamic country. (22:41)


OTHER TOPICS REFER TO THE SUGGESTED ANSWERS RECENTLY UPLOADED.


Friday, 14 September 2012

Criminal law I final update


S.304A
            If the prosecution does not have evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had acted intentionally or with knowledge when causing the death of another, s.300 and s.299 cannot be invoked. The alternative section is s.304A where the prosecution has to prove that the accused had acted rashly or negligently. As a result of his act, death has taken place. This section can be invoked when death is caused under various circumstances.

            In deciding whether the accused had acted rashly, the courts must look at all surrounding evidence. In a nutshell, it can be said that if the accused had realized that his act was serious or risky (decided in Balakrishnan) or if the accused was conscious of the illegal consequences that may follow, or he was aware that some kind of mischievous acts may result, then according to Nidamarti, the courts will find that the accused had acted rashly because he had taken the risk knowing of the consequences.

            A person is said to have acted rashly, if they knew of the risk, but they still took it, but with the hope that they will not occur.

            The maximum penalty for s.304A in Malaysia is 2 years imprisonment, whether convicted under rashness or negligence. However, in Singapore, the maximum penalty for causing death by rashness has increased to five years, with the maximum for negligence-based offences remaining at 2 years.

PP v Tiyatun
The accused persons in this case was convicted under s.304A for the ‘force feeding’ of their child.

Lim Hong Eng v PP
Rashness implies a disregard to the possibility of injury or death. It means that the accused having recognized a risk chooses to run that risk anyway.

            Rashness, like intention, will often be a matter of inference from the facts. If a risk is obvious and serious, the court may find it easy to infer that the accused recognized the risk, even if he or she claims ignorance.

Balakrishnan S v PP
The appellants were the commanding officer and supervising officer of a Prisoner of War training course. One soldier died and another was seriously injured as a result of being dunked four times, around 20 seconds each, in a tub containing water. The appellant claimed that he did not realize that such dunking was dangerous. The Court of course did not accept such reason.

S.321 and s.322

            If the facts state that the victim was injured, two sections can be invoked, s.321 and s.322. In order to successfully raise s.321, the nature of the injury should fall within s.319. This section causes a wide range of injuries which includes bodily pain, disease or infirmity.

            In Jashanmal, mental anguish was also considered as hurt within the meaning of s.319. If the prosecution proves that the actus reus of the accused falls within s.319, it has to further prove that the accused caused such an injury voluntarily, s.39. If the facts show that the nature of the injury is serious, severe or grievous, a more appropriate section would be s.322. S.320 defines certain types of injuries as grievous hurt. However, any kind of hurt which endangers or threatens the victim’s life could be considered grievous under s.320(h).

            The mens rea for both sections, s.321 and s.322, is the same (s.39). Therefore, the prosecution has to prove that the accused either had the intention to cause such an injury or had the knowledge that his actions could cause such an injury or he had a reason to believe (s.26) that his action will cause such an injury.

            S.95 is a defence that has been successfully pleaded in the case of Teo Geok Fong. In order to successfully plead this defence, the harm inflicted must be slight. Therefore, it cannot serve as a defence if the accused is charged under s.322. Additionally, the hurt must be of such a minor nature that it can be proven that a person of ordinary sense and temper would not complain.


Defences (ss. 76 – 90)

            The accused will raise defences as a legal justification so that the courts could excuse him for committing the crime that he’s being charged with. Some of these defences completely excuse the accused. On the other hand, some of these defences allow the charge to be reduced.

            The defence of mistake is recognized under 2 sections, i.e. s.76 and s.79. To plead the defence of mistake under both these sections, the mistake must be a mistake of fact and not a mistake of law. Both these sections are very similar because the defendant must have honestly believed in the mistake.

            However, there is 1 difference. Under s.76, the accused can plead the mistake of fact if he honestly believed that he was bound by law to do the act. Under s.79, however, the accused must have honestly believed that he was justified by law to do the act.

            A mistake of fact is an error as to the existence of any state of things. It could be made due to inadequate or wrong information. A case in point is Chirangi v State of Nagpur. Here the accused mistakenly believed that he was shooting a tiger when he actually shot his son.

            S.80 allows the accused to plead the defence of accident provided certain conditions are fulfilled. The act done must have been a lawful act and it must have been done in a lawful manner and it must have been done with proper care and caution. In addition to these elements, the defence must also prove that the accident took place without any criminal intention or knowledge.

            In Koh Poh Ing’s case, the accused was charged for causing the death of the boyfriend because he was accidentally stabbed in the stomach while he tried to remove a knife from the accused who was contemplating suicide. Accident was allowed to be pleaded.

            S.82 and s.83 prima facie prevent children from facing criminal sanctions. S.82 encompasses the Latin concept ‘Doli Incapax’. This section stipulates that a child below the age of 10 cannot be punished for any criminal offence. In order to plead this section, the child must have been below the age of 10 at the time the offence took place (irrebuttable presumption).

            S.83 excludes criminal liability of children if they are between the age of 10 and 12. In order to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the child had sufficient maturity and understanding, the surrounding facts of the case must be analysed. If the facts show that the child had hidden the murder weapon or had told lies during questioning so that he will not implicate himself, such facts suggest that the child had sufficient maturity to understand what he did was wrong.

            S.84 recognises the defence of insanity and it is governed by the M’Naghten Rules. In order to successfully plead this defence, several elements must be established. The accused was said to be suffering from unsoundness of the mind (which may be temporary or permanent) at the time he carried out the wrongful act. Unsoundness of the mind is wider than the ‘disease of the mind’ and this unsoundness of the mind must have been of such a nature or severity that it prevented the accused from knowing the nature of his wrongful act or the unsoundness of the mind prevented him from knowing what he did was wrong or against the law.

            A case in point is Jusoh v PP. Unsoundness of the mind in simple terms refers to mental malfunctioning. S.84 only allows the person to plead the defence if the mental malfunctioning is so severe that the accused is completely incapable of knowing what he did or, if he knew, his mental malfunction prevented him from knowing what he did was against the law.

            In PP v Rozman, the court did not allow the accused to plead the defence under s.84 because the court was of the opinion that subnormal intellect was not equivalent to an unsound mind. In Sinnasamy, the court held that irresistible impulse is not the same as an act done with an unsound mind.

            S.90 recognises the defence of consent. However, s.90 clearly stipulated that if the consent was given under s.90(a), (b), and (c), such a consent will not amount to a defence. The defence of consent is recognized and common in sport activities. Normally the consent given will be subjected to terms and conditions. If these terms and conditions are breached, then the offender cannot rely on the defence of consent. Similarly, the consent given may be invalidated if it falls under s.90(a), (b) or (c).

            The Penal Code recognizes intoxication under 2 subsections. The first form of intoxication is considered as involuntary intoxication. Merely been intoxicated prima facie will not be a defence unless the accused due to being intoxicated did not know that his act or omission was wrong or the intoxication prevented him from knowing what he was doing or what he failed to do.

            In order to plead this defence [s.85(2)(a)] successfully, the accused has to prove the following:
 The intoxication was carried out by a third party who did it maliciously or negligently and it was done WITHOUT consent. If consent was given then the defence can argue that the given consent is invalid due to s.90. If all these elements are established then the accused may be acquitted for the offence that he committed.

            S.85(2)(b) recognizes intoxication but it does not stipulate how the accused became intoxicated. The law recognizes this as a defence where it has prevented the accused from forming the intention. Some academics consider this type of intoxication as insane intoxication. Similar to s.85(2)(a), the level of intoxication must have been so great that it prevented the accused from forming the intention.
DPP v Beard – the appellant whilst intoxicated raped a 13 year old girl. She died of suffocation because the appellant put his hand over her mouth to prevent her from screaming.

            When the accused pleads the defence of intoxication under s.85, the outcome or the effect of pleading this defence is recognized under s.86(1). S.86(1) explains 2 effects:
1) If the accused successfully pleads s.85(2)(a), he will be completely acquitted.
2) Those who plead voluntary intoxication under s.85(2)(b) will be treated in the same way as if he pleaded the defence of unsound mind under s.84 whereby s.347 and s.348 of the CPC will authorize how such people will be dealt with. It is as though they have successfully pleaded under insanity (s.84).



Provocation

            S.300 has recognized certain defences whereby if successfully pleaded it will reduce murder to culpable homicide. One of it is the defence of provocation recognized under Exception 1 of s.300.
            In order to plead the defence of provocation, certain conditions must be satisfied:

1. The provocative conduct could be something said or something done and it must have been so grave that it caused the accused to lose self-control. The courts have not defined the meaning of grave but have considered the nature and the characteristics of the accused. In PP v Kwan Cin Cheng, the accused killed his girlfriend because of the comments made by her. The court recognized the emotional state of the accused and therefore allowed him to plead the defence of provocation.

            However, in another case, PP v Juminem, the accused was a domestic helper who killed her employer. In this case, the court held that the employer provoked her but the provocation was not considered to be grave. Besides establishing this, courts can only accept this defence if the provocative act or words were done by the victim and not by the third party.

2. Besides establishing these elements, the defence has to also show that the provocation was sudden. There is no clearly defined time-frame where courts have said that defence counsels must satisfy. However, if there is a delay between the provocative act and the death caused, it is logical for the prosecution to argue that the provocation was not sudden and the accused had time to cool off and planned or premeditated the killing.
P.S: Not all the time courts allow the defence of provocation as the accused could have chosen to react or leave the scene.

Nanavati’s case
- The fatal blow should be clearly traced to the influence of passion arising from the provocation and not after passion had cooled down by lapse of time, or otherwise giving room and scope for premeditation and calculation.

T Paramasparan Thanigajalam v PP [2012] 4 CLJ 309, the accused injured his wife 64 times which in its totality killed her. Accused tried to plead that the wife's confession of infidelity provoked him to kill her. Court rejected the defence.


                                         

Private Defences
s. 96 – right of private defence,
s.97 – defend oneself or another,
 s.99 – when right of private defence is not available
s.100 – right to private defence of s.97(a) extends to causing death
s.102 – commencement and continuance of s.97(a)
s.103 – when right of s.97(b) [property] extends to causing death
s.105 – commencement and continuance of s.97(b)

            S.96 recognises the right of private defence (to defend oneself or another). This right is recognized under s.97(a) and s.102 clearly stipulates that this right can only be exercised if the accused apprehended a reasonable apprehension of fear or danger (RAF). In a situation where death takes place because the accused protected himself or another, the accused will not be charged for causing death if he had used this right according to s.99. Therefore, s.100 excuses the accused if he’s accused of murder or culpable homicide or other offences.

PP v Dato’ Balwant Singh
- The accused in this case was in a car and he had a verbal quarrel with another person, a motorist. The motorist followed his car and took a stick wanting to injure the accused. The accused in many instances asked the motorist not to bother him but to no avail. Eventually the accused shot the motorist twice and the latter died. The issue was whether the accused could rely on the right to private defence. The prosecution tried to argue that the shooting constituted too much force. The Court allowed the accused to rely on s.100 to excuse himself of the criminal offence after looking at all of the evidences and the circumstances in the case.

            S.97(b) provides the right to defend one’s property. The accused is only allowed to exercise this right when he experiences reasonable apprehension of danger or fear to the property. This is recognized under s.105. The law will excuse the accused for causing death under s.103 if it can be shown that this right did not infringe s.99.

            Both these rights are subject to the conditions stipulated under s.99. Therefore, the accused cannot rely on the right of private defence if he acted when there was no fear, or when he used too much force or when he was using force that was not justified. In essence, the defence counsel will raise s.97, s.100, s.102 and s.103 and s.105 on the balance of probabilities and the prosecution will attempt to invoke s.99 with the purpose of showing that the accused should not rely on this defence.



Tutorial Guidelines
S.95

1. Critically evaluate the accuracy of this statement.
Section 95 of the Penal Code serves no purpose. It should therefore be removed.   (may not be correct)

            S.95 of the Penal Code provides a complete defence whereby it legally excuses the offender for causing harm of such a nature that a person of ordinary sense and temper would not complain. This section only excuses the offender if the harm was said to be slight. S.44 clearly stipulates that an injury caused illegally to any person, in body, mind, reputation or property would still be considered as harm. In essence, s.95 recognises the harm caused by the defendant but excuses him primarily because the injury caused was so minor that the person of ordinary sense and temper considers it to be so minor that he does not complain.

            S.95 has been raised in several cases. In Veeda Menezes v Yusuf Khan, the complainant suffered a small cut when a paper file was thrown during an argument involving 4 people. The accused intended to cause such hurt but he was still acquitted under s.95. This shows that s.95 has been used to completely excuse the offender since the cut caused is so slight that the person of ordinary sense and temper would not complain.

            Similarly in Teo Geok Fong v Lim Eng Hock, the accused was acquitted under s.95. In this case, the accused slapped her husband’s face. There were no marks on his face and he did not seek medical attention. S.95 was able to be applied as the victim did not seek medical treatment, showing that the harm caused by the accused was of a nature that a person of ordinary sense and temper would not complain.

            However, what is slight harm is not defined in the statute thus case law has to be resorted to. In Manzoor Ahmad v State of Allahabad, the accused gave a 15 year old boy a glass of milk containing copper sulphate, saying it was to cure headaches. The boy suffered diarrhoea and vomiting. The accused could not rely on s.95. This indicates that the harm caused was actually serious as it has failed to be considered ‘slight’ under s.95. The court here has drawn a boundary between a slight harm and a serious one.

            Furthermore, in Lim Hean Nerng v Lim Ee Choo, the accused punched a 70 year old man in the face and some ‘tenderness’ but no bruising had resulted. The court held that s.95 was not available to the accused. The implication is that the harm caused was not considered slight by the courts taking into account the physical condition of the accused. Additionally, the judgement is in line with the courts stand to not condone domestic violence.

            Based on the cases raised and discussed above, s.95 of the Penal Code definitely serves some purpose in excusing persons who have caused harm so slight that a person of ordinary sense and temper would not complain. However, s.95 is not clear since it is silent as to what constitutes slight harm. The extent of the applicability of s.95 is unclear, thus the section should be amended to expressly specify what constitutes slight harm.



Guidelines to Answering Problematic Questions [Question 1]

1) Read the facts properly and identify the wrongful act that took place
(a) death                                                          (b)Hurt or Grievous Bodily Hurt

Based on the fact that the victim had died, the prosecution could raise s.300 or s.299 or s.304A.

However, the fact states that she shot the victim 3 times knowing that he is a human being, it is likely that the prosecution could raise s.300(a).

2) In order to obtain a successful conviction under s.300(a), the prosecution has to prove the ingredients of this section beyond reasonable doubt (DPP v Woolmington).

3) S.33 states that the AR can be a positive act. Accordingly, Yeta has carried out a positive act by shooting the victim 3 times.

4) Besides proving the AR, the prosecution has to prove the MR of s.300(a) where it has to prove that Yeta had the intention to cause death when she shot the victim 3 times.

Cite 2 or 3 relevant cases and apply
Bhagwant Appaji v Kedari Kashinath, Tan Buck Tee v PP, Ismail bin Hussin v PP
Apply the cases and mention that Yeta had the intention to cause death.

5) Having established the AR and MR of s.300(a), prima facie Yeta could be convicted under s.302 of the PC.

6) However, based on the facts, Yeta could rely on several defences so that she is not punished under s.302.

7. Based on the facts that the victim died due to the wrong treatment, she could argue that it was not her shooting that caused his death. Courts have decided several cases pertaining to similar issues.
Courts in deciding cases such as R v Smith, R v Malcherek and Steel, and R v Blaue, have held that despite the intervening acts, it was the initial wounds which have caused the death of the victims. Therefore, it is very likely that Yeta could still be responsible for his death.

However, in R v Jordan, the court held that the intervening act broke the chain of causation which would mean that Yeta is not liable under s.300(a). She could be charged for causing grievous bodily hurt under s.322 or attempting to cause death under s.511.

8) Alternatively, Yeta could argue that she did not intend to kill her husband. In R v Latimer, where the facts were very similar to the present case, the courts held that if the wrongful act was carried out with the requisite mens rea, the defendant will be found guilty even if the victim was an unintended individual. The law is not concerned with who you kill.

9) Since the facts show that she shot her husband mistakenly, i.e. she mistook him for Badman, she could raise the defence of mistake found under s.76 and s.79. Under such circumstances, she would have to prove on a balance of probabilities that she was bound to shoot her husband or she was justified in shooting her husband respectively.

10) Finally, Yeta could raise the defence of accident under s.80. She should not have had the criminal intention to kill. Killing is not a lawful act. She did not exercise proper care and caution. Therefore, she may not rely on this defence.

Conclusion: Yeta is likely to be convicted under s.302 for causing death under s.300(a) since the defences may not be available unless she can prove that the chain of causation is broken where her conviction will be reduced to GBH under s.322 or attempting to cause death under s.511.


Importance of causation (summary of model answer)

            In order to establish an offence, the prosecution must prove that the defendant had committed the actus reus of that offence. S.33 clearly states that the actus reus could be a single act or a series of acts. Additionally, the section states that such acts could either be positive acts or omissions. Causation is a concept that relates to the actus reus of that offence. Courts referred to this concept only when an intervening act had accelerated the death of the victim after the defendant had injured the victim. Thus, causation is only of importance when an intervening act coupled with the actus reus of the defendant had caused the death of the victim.

            This concept is important because it assists the courts to determine whether the defendant who caused the injury or the person who caused the intervening act should bear the legal responsibility of causing death to the victim. In cases such as R v Smith, and R v  Malcherek and Steel, the courts have established, determined or decided that the persons who caused the initial wound will be legally responsible for the death of the victims despite the fact that there were other acts that contributed to the death of the victims. In deciding the causal link, the courts applied the ‘but for’ test and found that in all these cases the chain of causation was not broken. Thus, it was possible for the courts to decide the criminal responsibility of those who caused the death and the criminal responsibility of those who caused the intervening act.

            Besides that, this concept allows the accused to reduce his criminal liability by relying on an event that took place after he committed the actus reus or initial act. In R v Jordan for instance, although the defendant had stabbed the victim during a fight, he successfully relied on the intervening act (incorrect medical treatment) primarily to argue that he was legally not responsible for the death of the victim. Although this case was criticized, it shows that it is possible for the accused to reduce or evade his criminal liability by proving on a balance of probabilities that the death was caused by some other event.

            This concept is also important because it opens doors or creates opportunities for defendants to rely on any other factor so that their punishment is reduced. [Discuss R v Blaue, R v Pagett, R v Halliday] In all these cases, it is shown that courts are prepared to consider different types of acts as intervening acts. However, courts have strictly refused to accept such justifications that could absolve the defendant from his liability.

            Malaysian law too recognizes this concept of common law but has provided statutory solutions that courts could rely on when faced with such legal dilemma. Under Malaysian law, if the courts are confused as to who should bear the criminal responsibility under such circumstances, reference should be made to Explanation 1 and 2 of s.299. In essence these explanations clearly state that the chain cannot be broken despite the presence of an intervening act. Thus, it can be said that the concept is of importance and these Explanations provide guidelines to courts so that the link between the death and the defendant can be made.

CONCLUSION: